New Federal Limits Put Pressure on Solar Developers and Farmers
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has issued new guidance restricting the use of prime farmland for federally subsidized solar projects. The decision, announced in late September 2025, prevents certain taxpayer-funded programs from financing solar installations on land classified as “prime” or “unique” for agriculture.
The USDA says the rule is meant to protect the nation’s best cropland from being converted into solar fields to ensure food production remains a priority. But for Michigan, where agricultural land plays a central role in renewable energy development, this could slow the pace of the state’s clean energy transition.
Michigan Farmers Caught in the Middle
Michigan’s 1.8 million acres of prime farmland are now caught between renewable energy expansion and food security. Some farmers depend on solar leases for supplemental income, while others worry that covering fertile fields with panels could limit long-term agricultural use.
In a report by Michigan Farm News, agricultural groups supported the USDA’s decision, saying that solar subsidies had inflated land values and made it harder for traditional farmers to expand. “When farmland becomes a financial asset for energy development, small producers get priced out,” said Tim Rollins, policy advisor for Michigan Farm Bureau.
Renewable energy advocates disagree, arguing the rule is overly restrictive and could choke off investment in rural economies. Many counties, especially in central and southern Michigan, rely on lease payments from solar developers to help support struggling farms.
Agrivoltaics Could Offer a Compromise
One potential solution is agrivoltaics, which allows solar panels to coexist with crops or livestock. Michigan State University researchers are studying systems that could make solar compatible with farming by spacing panels higher or wider apart.
According to Dr. Bruno Basso, professor of environmental science at MSU, “Agrivoltaics is not a silver bullet, but it offers a way forward that protects soil health while still generating energy income for farmers.”
If Michigan expands agrivoltaic practices, it could help the state comply with federal farmland protections while maintaining solar growth. This approach aligns with Michigan’s goal of reaching 60 percent renewable electricity by 2035 under the MI Healthy Climate Plan.
The Larger Implication: Federal vs. State Priorities
The USDA’s rule also exposes a growing policy divide. Michigan lawmakers have passed measures to streamline renewable development, but federal farmland protections could slow projects that depend on both state and federal support.
Analysts warn this could delay solar development or force developers to relocate projects, increasing costs and limiting available land. That could make it harder for Michigan to meet its clean energy goals on time.
Supporters of the USDA policy say it restores balance between energy and agriculture. “We need clean energy, but we also need to feed the country,” said Annick Anctil, professor at Michigan State University. “The challenge is doing both responsibly.”
What It Means for Michigan’s Solar Future
This new rule is both a warning and an opportunity for Michigan. While it could delay some projects, it also encourages innovation in how renewable energy is deployed. Agrivoltaics, brownfield redevelopment, and rooftop solar may all see renewed focus as developers look for compliant and cost-effective options.
The future of Michigan’s solar industry may depend less on how much land is available and more on how creatively it is used.
Sources:
